Friday, December 27, 2019

Essay Similarities between Greek and Egyptian Mythologies

The ancient world was comprised of mysteries. There were no scientific explanations for the structure of the world, the existence of humans, or the meaning of life. To explain these dilemmas they turned to religion and mythology. However, as were often isolated geographically there was no universal answer to any of these questions, though many cultures many have derived similar solutions to certain questions, despite being separated by large physical distances, such as the Greeks and Egyptians. Although there are minor differences, Greek and Egyptian mythologies share many similarities. One parallel between Greek and Egyptian creation stories is that they both begin with a God or Gods being created from the universe. The creation of†¦show more content†¦In Greek and Egyptian mythologies, there is a supreme God. In Greek tradition this was Zeus, â€Å"Zeus was now King of all the gods and lived on Mount Olympus.† (Corsar, Reid Rooney, and Smith 9) In Egyptian mythology, this position was first held by Osiris, and the other deities herald him by saying â€Å"He lives, the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, beloved of Ra, living forever! Heir of Geb, Osiris, beloved of the gods, Osiris, given life, endurance, joy, health, all happiness, like Ra!† (Kaster 81) After being murdered by Set, he became ruler of the Netherworld, and was replaced as King of Upper and Lower Egypt, by his son, Horus. The idea of a supreme deity is common in both Greek and Egyptian traditions. Some Greek deities can also be identified with Egyptian ones, in particular the Greek Dionysus and the Egyptian Osiris. They both preside over fertility, in addition to their other duties. Another similarity is that they are both twice-born. Dionysus was born first from Semele’s womb and then later from Zeuss thigh. Osiris was the son of Geb and Nut and was resurrected by Isis after being murdered by Set. (Livingston, Greek and Egyptian Religious Parallels) Other Gods and Goddesses that are similar include Horus and Apollo, Isis and Demeter, Hathor and Aphrodite, Neith and Athena and Bast and Artemis. (FOOTNOTE GREEK AND EGYPTIAN RELIGIOUS PARALLELS) There appears to be an overlap between many deities in Greek and Egyptian mythologies.Show MoreRelatedThe Myth Of The Universe1565 Words   |  7 Pageswere created (El-Asward, Garry, El-Shamy, 2005, p.24-31). A major similarity in each of the different creation stories is the idea of water as the elemental source of life . For example, in ancient Egypt a hill emerges from the waters in the beginning, ancient Mesopotamia describes water as the first element, and ancient Greece saw Chaos as the first element and out of Chaos arises Gaia (earth). Chaos is another commonality between each of the creation myths. Nearly all of the great creation mythsRead More Mythology Essay887 Words   |  4 Pages â€Å"To some extent, mythology is only the most ancient history and biography. So far from being false or fabulous in the common sense, it contains only enduring and essential truth, the I and you, the here and there, the now and then, being omitted. Either time or rare wisdom writes it.† -nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Henry David Thoreau (1849) Every culture has evolved its own mythology, defining its character and offering a way to understand the world. Myths of every culture reveal the powerRead MoreDid the Ancient Greek Gods Exist?1234 Words   |  5 PagesDid the Ancient Greek Gods exist? The Ancient Greeks regarded their religion and mythology with much respect and loyalty. Although the Ancient Greek Gods are now seen as an explanation created by man, for natural forces and the world around us, there has been much evidence both for and against the debate that these Gods were real. The Greeks believed that the Earth was created with the birth of Gaia, or Mother Earth, from the dark void known as Chaos. It was believed that Gods were all-powerfulRead MoreMythology And The Creation Of Fire2081 Words   |  9 PagesMythology has played a huge impact in the development of society in the world. However not only is it effecting just society but the individuals living on Earth. The myths and legends of the gods and goddesses spread throughout the world, allowing citizens to believe in the values and morals of the story. Mythology has influenced not only the world previous to ours but present time today. Just like years before mythology has influence our scientific invention s and knowledge, daily life, religionRead MoreSimilarities in the Artwork of Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt, the Aegean cultures, and Ancient Greece941 Words   |  4 Pages The artworks of Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt, the Aegean cultures, and Ancient Greece have similarities that not only reflect objects and images, but also the media, style and representation. These countries were not always wealthy, clever, creative and powerful enough to gain supplies, but they all find a way to create art with what they had. They have all influenced on each other’s cultures and belief through their artistic values and ways, ranging from the materials and tools they use, positionRead MoreEssay about Ancient Egypt and Ancient Greece903 Words   |  4 Pagesmany important ancient civilizations that left a significant mark in the history of human development that even today leaves modern society in awe of its greatness. In spite of being distant civilizations, Ancient Egypt and Ancient Greece share similarities and difference in terms of how they practiced religion,political structure, everyday life style, and how they built the monumental architectures that co ntinued to amaze the modern world of today. These comparison and contrast explain their differenceRead MoreThe Evolution of Religion Essay967 Words   |  4 Pagesare we here? Where do we go when we die? Where did we come from? and Whats that? How different people answered these questions is important to study because it shows us the spiritual side of human nature. Especially now, a time of conflict between Islam and Western Civilization, it is important to look back and trace the evolution of religion. To see where we started and perhaps, gain some perspective into what is happening now and what may happen in the future. Early Man As far asRead MoreAncient Greece And Ancient Egypt Essay2265 Words   |  10 PagesAncient Greece and Ancient Egypt were both extremely prevalent societies between the times of 750 BCE and 450 BCE. For Greece, this includes a majority of what was considered the Archaic Age. During this time Greece was divided into many separate cities that each had their own distinct personality. For example, Spartans believed â€Å"it was deeds, not words, that counted† and â€Å"they organized their whole style of life around the demands of battle-readiness.† On the other hand, you have a city likeRead MoreThe Many Deities Of Death1005 Words   |  5 Pagesmost important deities in religions. Bell 2 While polytheistic religions have multiple gods and/or goddesses, monotheistic religions only have one God and they are completely all powerful. Polytheistic religions or mythologies have a complex system of deities governing various natural phenomena’s and many of the aspects of human life. One deity, often pictured darker or more menacing, is assigned the job of presiding over death. SomeRead MoreComparing The Greek And Egyptian Periods1175 Words   |  5 PagesHead from a Herm (Greek, (first quarter of the 5th century). I picked these two specific artworks due to their facial expressions and portrayal. How the human face is portrayed and sculpted through different centuries creates a magnificent approach to understanding how people were seen in these particular time periods. We can compare the two unique works of art, from two diverse time periods, and look into the similarities and differences that were produced. The Greek and Egyptian time periods were

Thursday, December 19, 2019

President Andrew Jackson Vetoes Bank Bill—July 10, 1832

Ernesto Hernà ¡ndez Rodrà ­guez Deacon Orr Economics October 9, 2012 President Andrew Jackson Vetoes Bank Bill—July 10, 1832 President Andrew Jackson veto against the bank bill is truly a communication to Congress but it is also like a political manifesto. He states that the privileges possessed by the bank are unauthorized by the Constitution, subversive of the rights of the States, and dangerous to the liberties of the people. In McCuloch v Maryland, the court turned to the necessary and proper clause which grants Congress enumerated powers which include the power to regulate collect taxes. President Jackson explains the necessity in regards to the functions that the bank is trying to fulfill: The degree of its necessity,†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦show more content†¦This act excludes the whole American people from competition in the purchase of this monopoly and dispose of it for many millions less than it is worth. The fourth section provision secures to the State banks a legal privilege in the Bank of the United States which is withheld from all private citizens. There was a lack of equality when paying with notes. A State bank that had notes by a particular branch could pay the dept to the Bank of the United States with those notes, but a citizen couldn’t pay with those notes but must have sold them at a discount or sent them to the branch to be cashed. This does not measure out equal justice to the hig h and the low, the rich and the poor. The president of the bank said that most of the State banks existed by its forbearance, the abstention of enforcing the payment of the debt. The influence of the self elected directory which is identified with those of the foreign stockholders may become concentered in a particular interest that could affect the purity of elections and the independence of the country when it goes to war. Their influence could have been so great as to influence elections and control the affairs of the nation. Works Cited Jackson, Andrew.  «Miller Center. » 10 de July de 1832. Miller Center. Monday October 2012. lt;http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3636gt;. McBride, Alex.  «pbs. » s.f. The Supreme Court. Monday October 2012.Show MoreRelatedAndrew Jackson s Political Power1902 Words   |  8 Pages Andrew Jackson’s Political Power Robert Atwood Ivy Tech Community College Andrew Jackson was a soldier, a lawyer, a husband, an orphan, and in his most famous status, the 7th President of the United States. Andrew Jackson was loved by the people, and hated by his political rivals. He pushed the limits of his power as the president, and at the same time restricted it, as to not overstep his place as the voice of the people. Through his terms as president he used his power to protect the rights

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Ucsf Stanford Healthcare †Why They Merged and Why the Merger Was Unsuccessful free essay sample

University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) merged its two public hospitals with Stanford’s two private hospitals. The two separate entities merged together to create a not-for-profit organization titled UCSF Stanford Health Care. The merger between the health systems at UCSF and Stanford seemed like a good idea due to the similar missions, proximity of institutions, increased financial pressure with cutbacks in Medicare reimbursements followed by a dramatic increase in managed care organizations. The first year UCSF Stanford Health Care produced a profit of $22 million, however three years later the health system had lost a total of $176 million (â€Å"UCSF-Stanford Merger,† n. d. ). The first part of this paper will address reasons why the two institutions decided to pursue the merger by looking through the theoretical lens of bounded rationality, prospect theory and resource dependence theory (RDT). The second half of the paper will purpose reasons why the merger was unsuccessful by considering key concepts in organizational behavior such as power and culture. The threatening and uncertain fiscal times led the leaders to select the option that they believed maximized their chances for survival. The theory of bounded rationality, proposed by Herbert A. Simon, suggests that people are largely limited by time, information and cognitive limitations(Simon, 1997). The merger between the two medical schools seemed to make sense, both institutions shared a common mission of treating the uninsured, training the next generation of innovative doctors, and remain at the forefront of breaking research and technology. Since both were going to be competing for increasingly scarce resources, joining forces made sense. Together they would be able to reduce spending on administrative costs, and better prepared to negotiate contacts with large insurance companies(â€Å"UCSF-Stanford Merger,† n. d. ). Simon suggests that people, bounded by time, cognitive ability and information, are more likely to make satisfactory decisions rather than optimal ones(Simon, 1997). Instead of focusing time and energy outlining potential ways to remain separate amongst the shifting payment structure UCSF and Stanford, both limited by time and fearful of the potential losses, agreed to merge. The merger was UCSF and Stanford’s way to mitigate risk and manage uncertainty. Prospect theory is a behavioral economic theory developed by Daniel Kahneman that holds that people are more likely to take higher risks when decisions are framed in negative terms(Kahneman Tversky, 1979). Although mergers are complex and risky the looming fear of decreased reimbursements made the leaders focus on the benefits of merging. Kahneman argues that people do not base their decisions on final outcomes, instead they base their decisions on the potential value of losses and gains(Kahneman Tversky, 1979). Instead of analyzing the risk of the merger, leadership focused on the more pressing burden, the bottom line. To stay alive in the era of managed care, university hospitals across the country were seeking mergers with private hospitals. Calculations showed that hospitals lost $4 million annually for each 1 percent drop in indemnity patient population(Etten, 1999). Since the 1990’s, indemnity insurance was on a drastic decline in San Francisco opening the market for managed care organizations(Etten, 1999). RDT looks at how the behavior of organizations is affected by their external resources. The theory, brought about in the 1970s, addresses organizations demand for resources, resources and power are directly linked(Pfeffer Salancik, 2003). RDT holds that organizations depend on resources thus the idea of merging, due to increasing resource scarcity, appealed to both institutions(Pfeffer Salancik, 2003). On paper, the merger between these two institutions made sense – both institutions were close to one another and competing for diminishing resources. Together they could reduce administrative costs and join forces to negotiate with large insurance companies. The need to create a new culture and dissolve historically existent power struggles were two large tasks that needed to be addressed in order to ensure a successful merger. However, the way in which the merger was organized did not lead to a successful merger. UCSF Health Care did not spend adequate time creating a shared culture in which the two organizations would see one joint organization with shared power (resources). On paper both organizations agreed to share power, however both parties behavior showed otherwise. Dr. Rizk Norman, co-chair of the combined physician group of UCSF and Stanford faculty, attests that neither institution was ever comfortable enough to share financial information(â€Å"UCSF, Stanford hospitals just too different,† n. d. ). UCSF did not fully disclose their fiscal concerns regarding one of their sinking hospitals, while Stanford was also guilty of ithholding information (â€Å"UCSF, Stanford hospitals just too different,† n. d. ). Merging into one should eliminate the sense of two separate entities, however not enough was done to shape the merger in such a way that facility and staff felt like equal partners. Loyalties existed within the organization, beginning at the top with the Board of Dir ectors. Structurally the board was split between seven Stanford board members and seven USCF board members and three non partisan members, however loyalties to ones particular institution never dissolved(â€Å"UCSF-Stanford Merger,† n. d. ). As outlined, RDT, holds that organizations depend on resources, which originate from their environment. Resources are an organizations power used to compete in their environment. The two health systems shared an environment, thus competed with one another for power (resources) (â€Å"UCSF-Stanford Merger,† n. d. ). Because Stanford was a for-profit organization, they held more fiscal power over UCSF. Pfeffer and Salancik argue that the way to solve problems of uncertainty and interdependence is to increase coordination, more specifically, to increase shared control of each other’s activities(Pfeffer Salancik, 2003). Had the two institutions worked from the beginning to increase coordination and communication between both institutions the merger may have more changes in succeeding. Increased coordination between the two institutions could have lead to the creation of a strong culture. Culture is the shared belief, expectations and values shared by members of an organization. (â€Å"Leading by Leveraging Culture Harvard Business Review,† n. d. ). Employing a new culture starts from the top, management must model in accordance with the new culture. This was not done at UCSF Stanford Health Care due to existing loyalties. Adding to the culture struggle, the institutions were far enough away from one another to merit concern. For an organization to flow smoothly, clear communication channels need to be established. Without open communication and collaboration a shared culture cannot emerge. Weak cultures harm the workplace by increasing inefficiencies that lead to increased costs. UCSF Health Care model from the top down to create a shared culture. Had leadership spent adequate time addressing ways to dissolve existing power struggles, and creating a shared culture that would set the foundation to achieve a new-shared vision, the merger could have been successful. Engaging leaders in creating a strategic plan to merge two separate existing cultures would have encouraged them to show support and dissolve power struggles. Shared resources, open communication and a culture of oneness may have set the foundation for a successful merger between the two organizations. References Etten, P. V. (1999). Camelot or common sense? The logic behind the UCSF/Stanford merger. Health Affairs, 18(2), 143–148. doi:10. 1377/hlthaff. 18. 2. 143 Kahneman, D. , Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. doi:10. 2307/1914185 Leading by Leveraging Culture Harvard Business Review. (n. d. ). Retrieved October 16, 2012, from http://hbr. org/product/leading-by-leveraging-culture/an/CMR260-PDF-ENG Pfeffer, J. , Salancik, G. (2003). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford University Press. Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of Bounded Rationality, Vol. 3: Emperically Grounded Economic Reason. The MIT Press. UCSF-Stanford Merger: A Promising Venture. (n. d. ). SFGate. Retrieved October 16, 2012, from http://www. sfgate. com/opinion/article/UCSF-Stanford-Merger-A-Promising-Venture-2975174. php#src=fb UCSF, Stanford hospitals just too different. (n. d. ). Retrieved October 16, 2012, from http://www. paloaltoonline. com/weekly/morgue/news/1999_Nov_3. HOSP03. html Fall 16 PM 827 A1 Strategic Management Of Healthcare Organizations UCSF Stanford Healthcare – Why They Merged and Why The Merger Was Unsuccessful Sofia Gabriela Walton Mini Exam #1 08

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

What a manager needs to know about planning

Managers are very important leaders. In fact, they are the drivers of the execution of an organization’s key strategies. With this power comes an even greater responsibility of effective management of human, material, and virtual resources. Without a feasible plan, one can jeopardize the entire organization’s success and even existence.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on What a manager needs to know about planning specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This paper highlights on the most important aspects that any manger should know. It points out steps a manger can take to ensure that stakeholders appreciate their role as ‘partners’, rather than ‘helping hands’ (Richardson 1). This way, they can be ‘consulted’ on important decision-making occasions and not just ‘informed’ about what is going to happen from then henceforth. Planning is an essential tool for e ffective mangers. The strategy they decide to employ in pursuit for success: achievement of long-range goals should be iterative and fluid. Key factors that should be considered in charting these plans include products, customers, and operations (Richardson 1). It all begins by goal setting. This refers to the prioritization of the organization’s objectives in a bid to yield the maximum benefits in terms of increased value of the firm to stakeholders. This process can include the formulation of a mission statement, and the plans that are set out should be flexible. Next is the development of the proposed plan. This stage involves an analysis of the current positioning of the firm based on current performance, the target destination that the firm hopes to land at; here, it is advisable to execute SWOT analysis- asses the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the firm (Richardson 2), which also includes looking into the various options of strategies that are avail able. Finally, evaluation of how the organization follows to arrive at its destination through measuring; resources, requirements, risks, and returns. The third step is customer analysis, which involves knowing who one is producing for, what they like, and why others buy from the competition is essential for strategizing development plans. This can be done through regular surveys or focus groups to obtain valid information. With this information, a manager then needs to conduct an internal business analysis from which the firm is operational: an assessment of available talents, functions, and relationships (Richardson 2) and financial positioning can be gauged. Such an analysis enables a manger to make strategic choices on what to produce and how (direction) to go about it. This comes in well through teamwork where a manager seeks answers from the team that will solve their current problems.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Examples of thoughtful strategies here include asset optimization, which involves devising the most effective plan to develop the firm’s available assets. It also takes into account core business thinking: finding out what business is fundamental to the success of the firm then maximizing on it, and trying to work with a ‘Best Practices List-a summarized list of tried and tested highly effective generic approaches for strategizing such as consolidation and bypassing (Richardson 3). Finally, implementation of these strategies or plans can be testy, to be effective, a manager should utilize a balanced scorecard, which liberates them from the domination of financial measures by integrating: finances, consumers, business processes, and learning and growth (Richardson 3). They thus avoid dealing with superior attitudes that can prove detrimental to the process. These tips can at least assist in solving some of the common chal lenges most managers face due to lack of planning. Works Cited Richardson, Bill. What Project Managers Need to Know about Strategic Planning. International Institute for Learning (2008): 1-4. This essay on What a manager needs to know about planning was written and submitted by user Siena Vasquez to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.